“What are you doing here then?”
“Grizzly bears, pilgrim! I collect the claws.”
This direct quote from the popular movie Jeremiah Johnson was supposed to take place in the 1800s. Back then you could hunt grizzly bears and collect the claws if you wanted to. But in the 21st century, that’s a bit of a no-no.
The Outdoor News just published an article titled, Man kills grizzly in self-defense, keeps claws as a memento. As you can probably guess, the outcome wasn’t too peachy for the individual that shot the grizzly in self-defense and “didn’t report the incident because he was “terrified” and said he knew taking the claws was illegal. “I was hoping I would never run into you two,” he told the U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USF&W) Service agents investigating the case.“
While I understand the fear he had when shooting a griz in self-defense and not reporting it because it seems we aren’t allowed to protect ourselves in the backcountry without feeling like we’re on trial for murder, I don’t understand why you would keep the claws? Not very smart and makes you question the rest of his story.
Situations like this make USFWS personnel naturally skeptical when they hear that a grizzly was shot in self-defense, thus making investigations of innocent situations seemingly more stringent than they need to be.
There are no amount of grizzly bear claws that are worth the loss of hunting privileges and loss of respect in your community. If you are hunting in grizzly country, report an incident if you have one to ensure your hunting privileges and respect aren’t lost.
5 comments
This story is a little far fetched, not entirely sure what the guy had been smoking. Timothy Tredwell comes to mind.
His mistake was not reporting it and while I’m sure in a self defense case the feds are not going to let you keep anything but your memory. I can understand him wanting to keep its claws a a memento of that very dangerous occasion I personally have taken many black bear legally and have keep their canine teeth as a memento and have made many necklaces out of them
I do understand why he would want to keep a memento of this experience. I believe he should be allowed to, & see no reason tht it should automaticaly make his story less believable. I do think he should have reported it, but considering the aditude of most game officials in matters like this I can also understand his reluctance. I understand the presure some game officials feel they are under from anti hunters & environmentalists, but I think there 1st duty is to the common person traversing the outdoors, not the activists.